Posted On: 05/29/2016 9:33:43 PM
Post# of 65629
What else DO you use to determine 'Red' or 'Blue' besides how they most recently voted? Objection noted and ruled immaterial.
In reverse order, no 'disgusting play with words' but rather your misreading of what I plainly stated.
People on this board routinely take cheap shots at SNAP benefit recipients as THOUGH they are NOT well distributed throughout States that routinely vote GOP.
As you can plainly read, they ARE very well distributed in the areas identified as poverty stricken.
Not all people who vote Republican are poor or dumb, but many of them are verifiably poor and poorly educated.
This is a political board, so the claims I'm countering, the same claims you routinely ignore, ARE political.
Now go get your shine box, go back to defending trade agreements, where you're on firmer ground, or anti-human caused climate change, where the ground is less firm and on which you're shakily standing with the science-illiterate, dumb-asses in the GOP!
Quote:
It's not political....that's the fn' point! Or are you making the point that that is so fn' contrary to idiotic beliefs that Republicans are more poor than democrats? Really?
Or is it that poor people are just too dumb and vote republican?...eh Bhawks?
Because that was and is your disgusting play with words.
In reverse order, no 'disgusting play with words' but rather your misreading of what I plainly stated.
People on this board routinely take cheap shots at SNAP benefit recipients as THOUGH they are NOT well distributed throughout States that routinely vote GOP.
As you can plainly read, they ARE very well distributed in the areas identified as poverty stricken.
Not all people who vote Republican are poor or dumb, but many of them are verifiably poor and poorly educated.
Quote:
In Appalachia, "it’s clear there’s a regional problem, born of isolation, geographic and political; exploitation, of timber and coal; and poor education," said Al Cross, director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues at the University of Kentucky.
This is a political board, so the claims I'm countering, the same claims you routinely ignore, ARE political.
Now go get your shine box, go back to defending trade agreements, where you're on firmer ground, or anti-human caused climate change, where the ground is less firm and on which you're shakily standing with the science-illiterate, dumb-asses in the GOP!
(0)
(0)
