Posted On: 05/27/2016 11:16:24 PM
Post# of 15187
Yes I found and read that case some time ago along with many others. The courts sometimes find for the plaintiff and sometimes for the defendant. In the case you mentioned the defendant didn't meet their burden of proof.
"a defendant has the burden of proving that the plaintiff intended the transaction to be usurious at its inception"
"a defendant has the burden of proving that the plaintiff intended the transaction to be usurious at its inception"
(0)
(0)
