Quote:

---

investigated for our Saudi and foundation connection,

---

I wonder if that 'connection' include donations as high as
6.6% of all donations to the Clinton Foundationin any given year, or as a % of total Clinton Foundation holdings?

Quote:

---

According to news accounts, Prince Al-Waleed's investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company, holds a 6.6% stake in 21st Century Fox, the parent corporation of the Fox News Group (which includes the Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Network)

---

As long as we're buying Saudi oil and selling them arms, I've no issue with Fox news nor with the Clinton Foundation.

(That's what 'single standards' an absence of hypocrisy and an un-ignited ass look like. LOL!)

And what's the worst that can happen?

"President Clinton welcome to the Kingdom, AGAIN.
What will be your Excellency's pleasure this time?

Keep pumping the sh*t out of our wells to keep the oil prices down, and continue to f*ck petro-state Russia? Our pleasure! Got some AWACS and THAAD missile defense components discounted prices in your assistant's satchel, Madam President?

A pleasure doing business with you, since 1941, your Highness."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_High_A...ea_Defense


http://www.snopes.com/fox-news-saudi-megyn-kelly/

Quote:

---

The term "co-owner" generally refers to a person who holds a 50% share in a business entity, or at least a share comparable to that of the other largest stakeholders, but Al-Waleed does not qualify on either count.

According to news accounts, Prince Al-Waleed's investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company, holds a 6.6% stake in 21st Century Fox, the parent corporation of the Fox News Group (which includes the Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Network) — a sizable chunk, but far from a controlling or co-controlling interest in the company.

If such minority institutional holdings qualify as "co-ownership," then Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal would also have to be considered a "co-owner" of business entities such as Twitter and Citigroup.

---