Posted On: 04/25/2016 12:12:52 PM
Post# of 11038
My interpretation to the last few posts:
#9377 Cor Clearing v Etrade Doc 27 (E*trade response) (3)
Etrade opposes the COR subpoena because it is too broad, and request 3rd party PII that doesn't help their case against CRGP.
9378/79 Judge granted Seal Motion 17 (1)
Judge Clark grants motion to seal limited portions of its briefs and exhibits that were deemed confidential by DTCC.
9380 Co Clearing v Calissio Update! (5)
Judge Strom Grants Default Judgment against CRGP.
Hope that helps, and is correct.
#9377 Cor Clearing v Etrade Doc 27 (E*trade response) (3)
Etrade opposes the COR subpoena because it is too broad, and request 3rd party PII that doesn't help their case against CRGP.
9378/79 Judge granted Seal Motion 17 (1)
Judge Clark grants motion to seal limited portions of its briefs and exhibits that were deemed confidential by DTCC.
9380 Co Clearing v Calissio Update! (5)
Judge Strom Grants Default Judgment against CRGP.
Hope that helps, and is correct.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
