Posted On: 04/17/2016 10:27:01 PM
Post# of 11035
Firstly, individual complaints make it more burdensome for them so if they want to prey on the weak, lets see how COR feels after it has 40 individual complaints to address/tailor. Some shareholders might have invested more than they received. Then theres the different legal defenses (DTCC at fault, clients at fault, COR at fault, FINRA at fault/Special divi arguments, broker liability, , no enrichment, tax complexity, countersuits, opening to discovery implications, other avenues for them to pursue, etc).
If they think discovery of the member firms is burdensome, they have no idea whats coming. Great for the attorneys, not so much for who foots the bill.
ALL IMHO
If they think discovery of the member firms is burdensome, they have no idea whats coming. Great for the attorneys, not so much for who foots the bill.
ALL IMHO
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
PLEASE READ IF YOU READ MY POSTS
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.