Posted On: 04/17/2016 1:37:56 PM
Post# of 43066
so P2O investors ask yourself the following (as one who entered Apple
way back about 14 years ago when Itunes was *introduced*) and whose
significant other still has their first Mac from 1990 ~
does P2O's founder (by rote P2O's disruptive tech) have the 3 qualities every *successful* public company SURVIVOR has?
passion
curiosity
tenacity
and if actual DD is done on other emerging sectors' disruptors .. does P2O's
current 8 years as a pubco (includes *time* mired in slimes/CEs' *muck*)
fit into realistic time lines .. when measured against those other successful
early adopters' time lines of 8/10/13 years?
and if SMBs can be utilized by an offshore CRIMINAL SYNDICATE to CON
RETAIL out of their money by systematically abusively shorting a stock where
the majority of actual investors have never sold one share .. would a CRIMINAL
enterprise take that *risk* if their *success* rate was 99%?
and if documentation was in place to show PTOI's volume via daily tapes/trades
and the tapes showed a CONsistent pattern of heirs/spares/hiddens/splits
re: *trades* .. would retail glean awareness over weeks/months/years
and if retails' awareness is coupled with actual P2O investors (many of whom)
who have never sold one share aligned with a mgmt that wrested back control
of P2O in mid August 2013 .. (with the resultant illegally manipulated PPS
take down from 35c to a smidge below 2c) .. while said mgmt ascertained
how best to *market* P2O's founder's multi $Million$ disruptive tech ~
well then what happens with P2O's execution beginning with *internal changes*
re: operations as duly noted via P2O's last 8K filed last month ..
rhetorical
know your risk/understand why CRIMINAL SYNDICATE's ANGST is *ratcheting*
and never stop doing DD on *time lines* of those successful early adopters
(emerging sectors) .. specifically as i used to note *there* for years .. share
structures of the disruptive techs' 800 pound gorilla at their IPO .. 12 to 18
months and at the 5 year pubco level
suspect for those who haven't undertaken that DD .. it will prove informative
4kids
way back about 14 years ago when Itunes was *introduced*) and whose
significant other still has their first Mac from 1990 ~
does P2O's founder (by rote P2O's disruptive tech) have the 3 qualities every *successful* public company SURVIVOR has?
passion
curiosity
tenacity
and if actual DD is done on other emerging sectors' disruptors .. does P2O's
current 8 years as a pubco (includes *time* mired in slimes/CEs' *muck*)
fit into realistic time lines .. when measured against those other successful
early adopters' time lines of 8/10/13 years?
and if SMBs can be utilized by an offshore CRIMINAL SYNDICATE to CON
RETAIL out of their money by systematically abusively shorting a stock where
the majority of actual investors have never sold one share .. would a CRIMINAL
enterprise take that *risk* if their *success* rate was 99%?
and if documentation was in place to show PTOI's volume via daily tapes/trades
and the tapes showed a CONsistent pattern of heirs/spares/hiddens/splits
re: *trades* .. would retail glean awareness over weeks/months/years
and if retails' awareness is coupled with actual P2O investors (many of whom)
who have never sold one share aligned with a mgmt that wrested back control
of P2O in mid August 2013 .. (with the resultant illegally manipulated PPS
take down from 35c to a smidge below 2c) .. while said mgmt ascertained
how best to *market* P2O's founder's multi $Million$ disruptive tech ~
well then what happens with P2O's execution beginning with *internal changes*
re: operations as duly noted via P2O's last 8K filed last month ..
rhetorical
know your risk/understand why CRIMINAL SYNDICATE's ANGST is *ratcheting*
and never stop doing DD on *time lines* of those successful early adopters
(emerging sectors) .. specifically as i used to note *there* for years .. share
structures of the disruptive techs' 800 pound gorilla at their IPO .. 12 to 18
months and at the 5 year pubco level
suspect for those who haven't undertaken that DD .. it will prove informative
4kids
(0)
(0)
