Posted On: 04/06/2016 10:21:01 AM
Post# of 43066
I'm sure Mr. Heddle could run the stock up further if he says the right things. A couple of zingers and the average-downers will open up their wallets again.
My negativity is toward PTOI's pyrolysis 'technology'. Swindler Mr. Bordynuik represented that his version of cooking plastic was commercially viable and Mr. Heddle is riding Mr. Bordynuik's coattails, content to let shareholders believe the fake numbers from the past are at least close and to not say a word about how uneconomical the process really is.
I did see your point a few years ago about the costs, Faustus--if PTOI could consistently get plastic from sellers who place ads at prices well below the average prices and if those cheaper plastics generally work well in the processor, PTOI could be commercially viable. I find that highly unlikely...but you did have a point.
You'll have to agree with me, though, that Mr. Heddle, who is supposedly looking out for your best interests and supposedly wants to do right by shareholders, should be crystal clear in telling shareholders the best case of what went into the processor and what came out. You'll also have to agree with me that given Mr. Heddle's failure to share that basic and important information, you and other shareholders should be pressing Mr. Heddle for that answer. PTOI's entire value rides on that answer and it only requires a simple e-mail. It's the simplest, yet most valuable, DD shareholders can possibly do...yet nobody does it. Some investors here have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they, inexplicably, refused to send an e-mail and ask that important question.
My negativity is toward PTOI's pyrolysis 'technology'. Swindler Mr. Bordynuik represented that his version of cooking plastic was commercially viable and Mr. Heddle is riding Mr. Bordynuik's coattails, content to let shareholders believe the fake numbers from the past are at least close and to not say a word about how uneconomical the process really is.
I did see your point a few years ago about the costs, Faustus--if PTOI could consistently get plastic from sellers who place ads at prices well below the average prices and if those cheaper plastics generally work well in the processor, PTOI could be commercially viable. I find that highly unlikely...but you did have a point.
You'll have to agree with me, though, that Mr. Heddle, who is supposedly looking out for your best interests and supposedly wants to do right by shareholders, should be crystal clear in telling shareholders the best case of what went into the processor and what came out. You'll also have to agree with me that given Mr. Heddle's failure to share that basic and important information, you and other shareholders should be pressing Mr. Heddle for that answer. PTOI's entire value rides on that answer and it only requires a simple e-mail. It's the simplest, yet most valuable, DD shareholders can possibly do...yet nobody does it. Some investors here have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they, inexplicably, refused to send an e-mail and ask that important question.
(1)
(0)
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
