Posted On: 04/05/2016 10:54:39 AM
Post# of 9144
Re: rayludwiczak #2200
Rayludwiczak,
You have been Chicken Little for years with your comments against NanoLogix. Your statement of "for as long as this company has been in business and indicating sales less than a million" demonstrates your lack of a grasp of reality for the diagnostic business and challenges faced by any company competing with BD, Thermo Fisher, and others. When was NanoLogix first incorporated? 1989 I believe. Did they sell product at all over their first incarnation? Not that I can find.
Jump ahead...
I remember NanoLogix coming out in mid-2012 with news that they were starting commercial sales. If they've gone from "no sales" to "sales of hundreds of thousands" but less that "a million" in the past 3-1/2 years that should impress people smart enough to understand what it takes to grow in a terrible market environment. Unfortunately it doesn't appear you're one who's able to understand.
Scott
You have been Chicken Little for years with your comments against NanoLogix. Your statement of "for as long as this company has been in business and indicating sales less than a million" demonstrates your lack of a grasp of reality for the diagnostic business and challenges faced by any company competing with BD, Thermo Fisher, and others. When was NanoLogix first incorporated? 1989 I believe. Did they sell product at all over their first incarnation? Not that I can find.
Jump ahead...
I remember NanoLogix coming out in mid-2012 with news that they were starting commercial sales. If they've gone from "no sales" to "sales of hundreds of thousands" but less that "a million" in the past 3-1/2 years that should impress people smart enough to understand what it takes to grow in a terrible market environment. Unfortunately it doesn't appear you're one who's able to understand.
Scott
(8)
(3)
