Posted On: 04/04/2016 10:04:54 PM
Post# of 7802
Are you saying FS 836.08 doesn't apply?.......
If so, why not?
You got a poster on the Hub trying as hard as he can to show coins were found on the site. Apparently coins have been found on the beach, but not the site. And it wasn't one of the company's archaeologist as SFRX claimed.
I have linked the permit, but not one poster has shown it is not SFRX 's permit.
SFRX claims my posting hurts the company. So why aren't they looking for a correction and an apology? Wouldn't that have the opposite effect?
Why or why not?
If so, why not?
You got a poster on the Hub trying as hard as he can to show coins were found on the site. Apparently coins have been found on the beach, but not the site. And it wasn't one of the company's archaeologist as SFRX claimed.
I have linked the permit, but not one poster has shown it is not SFRX 's permit.
SFRX claims my posting hurts the company. So why aren't they looking for a correction and an apology? Wouldn't that have the opposite effect?
Why or why not?
(1)
(1)
