Posted On: 04/01/2016 11:37:45 AM
Post# of 7802
There are several documents. First of all the original complaint makes several, including item 83.
The Defendant can't ban posters. SFRX also admitted they lost no vendor contracts in the Interrogatories, though they said they did in the original complaint.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine
But there are countless examples. I'm up to about a dozen false statements made by SFRX/Huffman in all the filings. But it's best to start with the link above.
But you and others were banned by Ihub admin. Posters can't ban other posters on stock board.
They made him out to be a real boogie man.
The Defendant can't ban posters. SFRX also admitted they lost no vendor contracts in the Interrogatories, though they said they did in the original complaint.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine
But there are countless examples. I'm up to about a dozen false statements made by SFRX/Huffman in all the filings. But it's best to start with the link above.
But you and others were banned by Ihub admin. Posters can't ban other posters on stock board.
They made him out to be a real boogie man.
(0)
(0)
