Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
Posted On: 03/26/2016 1:52:43 PM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #5890
In addition to Maher's, and others, 'wild implausibility' argument, there is this:

Quote:
Breitbart Had Story But Chose Not To Publish



I'm not aware of 'careful choice' being among Breitbart's journalistic 'standards'. How weak did the 'evidence' have to
be for B not to 'publish'?

But I agree, Cruz's Cheerios have urine on them now.

(0)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site