I received a PM this afternoon with some interesting questions, the likes of which most of us have seen coming from some no longer welcome on this board. I typed up my long winded reply and realized I should share it since it helps explain why we watch for vermin so diligently here. After all, this is the official investors forum for RMH Brands right?
" Wondering should be answered in time. Out loud with no proof either way but leaning to the negative is treading on thin ice in the chicken little area that bashers prefer to dwell in, so even if putting the company or it's chances for success down isn't your intent, it has the same effect and therefore is no more welcomed on the official board of the RMH Brands long term investors than a true basher would be. Like I said, if you ask and no absolute concrete "proof" of big profit already exists, then asking repeatedly is just an obvious tactic used by fear and doubt generators. We've had others insist on trying to get mileage out of that. They were banned for it because all longs here know that a start up without a parent corporation or a billionaire backer or founder to front the start up costs will inevitably have to endure some dilution. The point is that if you can find enough evidence to convince you as a ground floor investor that the brand will grow fast enough to generate net profits before that dilution gets out of hand, then you'll be where I am. Anyhow, who invests long in a pink sheet traded company without anything substantial for evidence to support good odds of long term success? A pure shit house luck gambler, that's what. I had to dig deep for the nerve to keep buying this stock all the way down into the .02's, but the whole time I did that I kept seeing more and more evidence suggesting this brand was going to make it big and that was enough for me personally. Some will never be happy until the company has already achieved that huge success and has documented mega million dollar profits to prove it. That's not ground floor investing. It's not hard to pick winners that have already won. It is hard, however, to realize the same growth in your portfolio as you can realize from a well founded speculation that plays out as you believed it would. I'm not the only one here in that boat. We're happy to trust that it will go where it appears to be headed because absolute proof does not and can't exist at this stage of development, so if an investor isn't willing to wait and see they shouldn't hang around antagonizing those of us who are willing to wait. That sums up those who were banned. Willing bashers, liars or just those that must have proof, doesn't matter. Once they've pissed off the majority of longs here, usually only after repeated warnings or requests to cease and desist, they are shown the door because they bring nothing valuable to the table, only irritation and disruption. We don't just feel the need to police the board, we're absolutely certain of the need. To not do so allows this board to be polluted with bullshit like those boards we left behind for this one, and Investor's Hangout lets us run the board like a democracy. If the majority agrees, it's good enough for us. It's not like anyone's being lynched here, just shown the door once it's apparent that they won't get the answers they need and they're not offering anything helpful either. If your concerned about sources of capital, why are you long (since capital only gets worse as you turn back the clock) and why bother those who aren't nearly so concerned? By concerned, I mean doubtful. After what I spelled out above, I'm sure you know that if it's doubt you have, when no crystal ball is available to appease your doubt, you either need to wait with the rest of us for the story to unfold or throw in the towel and leave in search of greener pastures.
" Wondering should be answered in time. Out loud with no proof either way but leaning to the negative is treading on thin ice in the chicken little area that bashers prefer to dwell in, so even if putting the company or it's chances for success down isn't your intent, it has the same effect and therefore is no more welcomed on the official board of the RMH Brands long term investors than a true basher would be. Like I said, if you ask and no absolute concrete "proof" of big profit already exists, then asking repeatedly is just an obvious tactic used by fear and doubt generators. We've had others insist on trying to get mileage out of that. They were banned for it because all longs here know that a start up without a parent corporation or a billionaire backer or founder to front the start up costs will inevitably have to endure some dilution. The point is that if you can find enough evidence to convince you as a ground floor investor that the brand will grow fast enough to generate net profits before that dilution gets out of hand, then you'll be where I am. Anyhow, who invests long in a pink sheet traded company without anything substantial for evidence to support good odds of long term success? A pure shit house luck gambler, that's what. I had to dig deep for the nerve to keep buying this stock all the way down into the .02's, but the whole time I did that I kept seeing more and more evidence suggesting this brand was going to make it big and that was enough for me personally. Some will never be happy until the company has already achieved that huge success and has documented mega million dollar profits to prove it. That's not ground floor investing. It's not hard to pick winners that have already won. It is hard, however, to realize the same growth in your portfolio as you can realize from a well founded speculation that plays out as you believed it would. I'm not the only one here in that boat. We're happy to trust that it will go where it appears to be headed because absolute proof does not and can't exist at this stage of development, so if an investor isn't willing to wait and see they shouldn't hang around antagonizing those of us who are willing to wait. That sums up those who were banned. Willing bashers, liars or just those that must have proof, doesn't matter. Once they've pissed off the majority of longs here, usually only after repeated warnings or requests to cease and desist, they are shown the door because they bring nothing valuable to the table, only irritation and disruption. We don't just feel the need to police the board, we're absolutely certain of the need. To not do so allows this board to be polluted with bullshit like those boards we left behind for this one, and Investor's Hangout lets us run the board like a democracy. If the majority agrees, it's good enough for us. It's not like anyone's being lynched here, just shown the door once it's apparent that they won't get the answers they need and they're not offering anything helpful either. If your concerned about sources of capital, why are you long (since capital only gets worse as you turn back the clock) and why bother those who aren't nearly so concerned? By concerned, I mean doubtful. After what I spelled out above, I'm sure you know that if it's doubt you have, when no crystal ball is available to appease your doubt, you either need to wait with the rest of us for the story to unfold or throw in the towel and leave in search of greener pastures.
7
1
