Posted On: 03/15/2016 1:10:13 PM
Post# of 30066
Re: Both shallow #22822
What questions do you think they will ask Both shallow?
1/ Will you dilute this stock to triple zero levels?
2/Why has Lympro failed to produce revenue to date as promised?
3/Why didn't you just say "we will fleece longs" instead of saying that one of the main reasons we did a RS of 150:1 "was to prevent a hostile takeover of the company"? (Eluded to in SEC filings)
4/How much was the tab to pay Zack's to print a target price of anywhere between $3/share - $18/share post RS?
5/Why wasn't the NASDAQ uplist achieved as indicated multiple times throughout 2014-2015?
6/Why do NT and Red continue only promo-ing so-called positives while banning anyone that presents any indication that would forewarn any newcomers to the potential dangers to investing in this Company?!
I don't disrespect you Both, but these subtleties can attract attention from the SEC...and frankly, that is not the kind of attention any true long wants to attract and from what I see it looks as though they promote their own agenda....I may be wrong but it looks bad from events leading up to today, including the SP we have to endure. I still look for an entry point in this Company but this bs must stop...and all this time I believed that a private board was supposed to be objective ... but guess what!
1/ Will you dilute this stock to triple zero levels?
2/Why has Lympro failed to produce revenue to date as promised?
3/Why didn't you just say "we will fleece longs" instead of saying that one of the main reasons we did a RS of 150:1 "was to prevent a hostile takeover of the company"? (Eluded to in SEC filings)
4/How much was the tab to pay Zack's to print a target price of anywhere between $3/share - $18/share post RS?
5/Why wasn't the NASDAQ uplist achieved as indicated multiple times throughout 2014-2015?
6/Why do NT and Red continue only promo-ing so-called positives while banning anyone that presents any indication that would forewarn any newcomers to the potential dangers to investing in this Company?!
I don't disrespect you Both, but these subtleties can attract attention from the SEC...and frankly, that is not the kind of attention any true long wants to attract and from what I see it looks as though they promote their own agenda....I may be wrong but it looks bad from events leading up to today, including the SP we have to endure. I still look for an entry point in this Company but this bs must stop...and all this time I believed that a private board was supposed to be objective ... but guess what!
(5)
(3)
