Posted On: 03/07/2016 10:36:37 PM
Post# of 65629
No they did not..... probably because it was a sitting ambassador. The last senator that died in an attack was Leo Ryan in 1978(on visit). It was an attack on an embassy in Libia where an ambassador was on visit.
WoW...you can not understand the difference? He sent pout a wire stating that the area was compromised...and there was no action. ???? what the f' are you not getting ...and why are you defending such by stating past failures?????????????????????????????????????
Get a fn' grip. A failure is just that...a failure....cut the horse shit comrade approach.
"One reason, he said, is that an American ambassador died in the attack, which hadn’t happened since the 1970s. Another relevant question, Gartenstein-Ross said, "is whether what happened was put to the American people in an honest manner, not just with respect to the administration, but also with respect to the intelligence community.""
done with this game....period.
WoW...you can not understand the difference? He sent pout a wire stating that the area was compromised...and there was no action. ???? what the f' are you not getting ...and why are you defending such by stating past failures?????????????????????????????????????
Get a fn' grip. A failure is just that...a failure....cut the horse shit comrade approach.
"One reason, he said, is that an American ambassador died in the attack, which hadn’t happened since the 1970s. Another relevant question, Gartenstein-Ross said, "is whether what happened was put to the American people in an honest manner, not just with respect to the administration, but also with respect to the intelligence community.""
done with this game....period.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
