Posted On: 02/25/2016 4:50:52 PM
Post# of 22940
I've been reading, reading, reading. Posts like your's help.
Frankly, I got tired of studying without a dog in the hunt so I'm here with TPAC in what I consider on-the-job-training. The lessons come home and stick when its not just academics and you can feel and taste the emotion.
If you are right, and I think you are, my first penny buy (TPAC) is down right lucky, because it is not skill on my part. Pure Luck as far as DD goes. What I am good at is evaluating how people make their case and am pretty good at figuring out who knows what they are talking about and those who ... well .. not so much. Its not really about what they are saying but more how they are saying.
One thing I use to determine who is lying and who isn't is the intensity and quality (or lack) of their posts. I have noted the negative posts are short on facts and high on emotional content. In many ways the negative posts give me more confidence than even the positive posts. by far, most of the negative posts do not carry an air of credibility (some negatives have posted legitimate concerns but they are hard to find in the noise)
By comparison, I have reviewed a few other boards where the tone of the negative post do carry an air of credibility, kind of opposite in the TPAC converstations.
So, based on my evaluation of how people talk about TPAC, I am a more confident long, but I have to be honest and say I got here by luck, not skill.
Frankly, I got tired of studying without a dog in the hunt so I'm here with TPAC in what I consider on-the-job-training. The lessons come home and stick when its not just academics and you can feel and taste the emotion.
If you are right, and I think you are, my first penny buy (TPAC) is down right lucky, because it is not skill on my part. Pure Luck as far as DD goes. What I am good at is evaluating how people make their case and am pretty good at figuring out who knows what they are talking about and those who ... well .. not so much. Its not really about what they are saying but more how they are saying.
One thing I use to determine who is lying and who isn't is the intensity and quality (or lack) of their posts. I have noted the negative posts are short on facts and high on emotional content. In many ways the negative posts give me more confidence than even the positive posts. by far, most of the negative posts do not carry an air of credibility (some negatives have posted legitimate concerns but they are hard to find in the noise)
By comparison, I have reviewed a few other boards where the tone of the negative post do carry an air of credibility, kind of opposite in the TPAC converstations.
So, based on my evaluation of how people talk about TPAC, I am a more confident long, but I have to be honest and say I got here by luck, not skill.
(2)
(0)
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.
