Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
Posted On: 02/25/2016 1:17:53 PM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #3174
Quote:
Hillary is hoping for a strong progressive? How about someone with just damn good credentials...eh? [/quote

C'mon now, that's 'comrade' talk! Of COURSE each party tries to nominate judges who at least are not hostile to the principles of the nominating president.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with judges nominated by progressives or by conservatives.

Either their rulings are intellectually rigorous and consistent, or they aren't. Would you argue that Alito and Roberts weren't selected because they were conservative judges with a record of rulings that were 'reassuring' to Republicans?

And of course there are surprises and disappointments.

See Kennedy and Roberts on the ACA decisions.



(0)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site