$TPAC You definitely make some valid points as to the way the bubbles affect the price, with the sometimes unfortunate consequence of trapping newcomers at the top of a false start. And even more accurate is in stating that in the end, the price ends up in the same place. While that may not be the case for all stocks, ones with legitimate revenues find their place and get locked in to a pretty definitive range.

I am on the fence as to whether I'd rather not hear anything until the ink is dried. So many connections can be made between one item and the next with the ongoing communications, and in my eyes, the transparency is a huge breath of fresh air. As I mentioned in a recent reply to CountryMac, the silence doesn't bother me a bit, nor do the dips. There is something great about the suspense. But also as I mentioned in another previous post, there can be an info boom after a quiet period. I think cycling silence and information is a great way to play things, as both dynamics serve equal purposes and create equal relief for different types of fundamental traders.

So, my vote is for both. I like having both silent periods that create anticipation and info campaigns that make the silence worth the wait, which give us plenty to hang on to when things go dark again. I am also of the opinion that buying now will also lead to a 1000%+ increase for those with the patience to hold for a period of several months, though maybe only weeks if the news is right.