Posted On: 02/22/2016 9:02:46 AM
Post# of 75101
Re: adirondackhi #18150
thx, adack, for that clarification. i'm at the point where i just dont care about anyone named cheryl and their affiliation (or lack thereof) and significance (and lack thereof) to RMHB currently and this board. what tom's wife has done in the past doesn't concern me or effect this stock, nor does the mj queen named cheryl.
nopsin was suggesting there was some prolific connection and even a media black out and it piqued my interest. but alas, it was just another episode of fauxnews.
nopsin was suggesting there was some prolific connection and even a media black out and it piqued my interest. but alas, it was just another episode of fauxnews.
(2)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼