Posted On: 02/13/2016 10:06:47 PM
Post# of 65629
No...1987 was not a presidential election year. You said that 1988 was a lame duck year .. so I am assuming 1987 was a lame duck year also?
So...Reagan had "two" lame duck years....ha!...ha!....get a grip ...semantics? It's embarrassing....please stop!
Quote:
Posted On: 02/13/2016 9:17:48 PM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #1821
Confirmed in '88, a lame duck year for president Reagan.
Did Dems whine "not in 50 years...."
No, they did not.
So...Reagan had "two" lame duck years....ha!...ha!....get a grip ...semantics? It's embarrassing....please stop!
(1)
(0)
