Posted On: 02/13/2016 8:43:09 PM
Post# of 96881
These are approximate numbers but to me it just shows some of what the r/s will do to the shorts.
Let's say a 4:1 split taking o/s down to 500 million (again, approximate but this leaves a little dilution buffer).
Let's say WHOEVER wants our pps to go down to .0027 again (it won't, but let's just say).
Buying 5 million shares at .0027 would cost $13,500 and give you 1% of the entire company. A lot of the float is locked up, if they would dare attempt to take it down to this level AND NTEK continued to show strong progress a squeeze would happen.
Less float means less tricks available at their disposal.
I'm guessing the shorts / naked shorts really want to know the fine details of the restructuring of debt to let them know WHEN they will have to cover. Keep them guessing NTEK.
Let's say a 4:1 split taking o/s down to 500 million (again, approximate but this leaves a little dilution buffer).
Let's say WHOEVER wants our pps to go down to .0027 again (it won't, but let's just say).
Buying 5 million shares at .0027 would cost $13,500 and give you 1% of the entire company. A lot of the float is locked up, if they would dare attempt to take it down to this level AND NTEK continued to show strong progress a squeeze would happen.
Less float means less tricks available at their disposal.
I'm guessing the shorts / naked shorts really want to know the fine details of the restructuring of debt to let them know WHEN they will have to cover. Keep them guessing NTEK.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
