Posted On: 02/10/2016 6:07:35 PM
Post# of 22940
I'm reposting this because time ran out and I couldn't change what apparently showed up without my intent... an emoji at the end of this sentence "the TA had understated the base number" .... apparently because I placed a paranthesis and semi-colon at the end, too funny!
Hi... sounds like an 8A-12G filing has brought on questions... but the fact Bill actually put out that filing (cause share structure, including changes, will show in the upcoming 10-K) and gone right on twitter to explain, to me, is reassuring .... "the TA had understated the base number" ...
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings
The responsibility for error lies with me, not the TA. Ultimately I'm responsible for my posts. I should have double checked the numbers.
So, I remain confident as the fundamentals have NOT changed and there's plenty to look forward to seeing materialize based on his recent tweets.
For me, maybe an opportunity tomorrow... I should really be on my computer more and not go out as much, ahaha
Hi... sounds like an 8A-12G filing has brought on questions... but the fact Bill actually put out that filing (cause share structure, including changes, will show in the upcoming 10-K) and gone right on twitter to explain, to me, is reassuring .... "the TA had understated the base number" ...
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings
The responsibility for error lies with me, not the TA. Ultimately I'm responsible for my posts. I should have double checked the numbers.
So, I remain confident as the fundamentals have NOT changed and there's plenty to look forward to seeing materialize based on his recent tweets.
For me, maybe an opportunity tomorrow... I should really be on my computer more and not go out as much, ahaha
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
