Snakeclaw's not the idiot here. Crawford didn't leave gracefully and continued to try and force his bull shit opinions in through the back door in the form of PMs. Why do you let it bother you? Seems to hit a nerve and then you defend him and his opinion. Why? If you find his opinions valuable and defendable then you shouldn't be here either. We saw through his arguments as anything but genuine which is why he was banned, not because he didn't like the investment. Those who don't like an investment might say so, but they aren't going to waste their "more valuable than yours" precious time trying to save people they don't even like from making a poor investment choice. His backdoor efforts are the main reason we suspect you're true identity. Don't bother defending anyone who has previously bashed this company and expect our approval. Don't care how you're related.