Posted On: 02/02/2016 8:10:49 PM
Post# of 3605
Please bear in mind my following opinions...
1. The 250 kW was probably converted in a day, including lunch break.
2. That is different from retrofit with a 'production' part (currently late).
3. #2 has nothing to do with #1. #2 is for 'ship' dates NOT proof tests.
4. If Cummins saw it running and lots of hours on the meter, that's a win.
5. Cummins could have the 'late' parts made by their vendors. Solved!!
6. The way the stock IS is the way it IS, I am in cheap & $ to be made.
7. There is no hand for GC to tip. PJ & CMI have all the insight... period.
8. GC has the patent and the nature to make it stick.... period.
9. "progress on retrofit" does not mean it is not running. See #3
10 GC should tell nobody except CMI the 250 kW has over 700hr runtime.
11 If someone offered me $1 a share right now I would not sell... period.
12. Only a 'joint effort' was mentioned by GC and that could be anything.
1. The 250 kW was probably converted in a day, including lunch break.
2. That is different from retrofit with a 'production' part (currently late).
3. #2 has nothing to do with #1. #2 is for 'ship' dates NOT proof tests.
4. If Cummins saw it running and lots of hours on the meter, that's a win.
5. Cummins could have the 'late' parts made by their vendors. Solved!!
6. The way the stock IS is the way it IS, I am in cheap & $ to be made.
7. There is no hand for GC to tip. PJ & CMI have all the insight... period.
8. GC has the patent and the nature to make it stick.... period.
9. "progress on retrofit" does not mean it is not running. See #3
10 GC should tell nobody except CMI the 250 kW has over 700hr runtime.
11 If someone offered me $1 a share right now I would not sell... period.
12. Only a 'joint effort' was mentioned by GC and that could be anything.
(0)
(0)
