I have a passionate belief about where this company is headed and it motivates me quite a bit. I know some will have a hard time being patient, but there's a big difference between that and using BS to beat down a start up that has already made such awesome progress. There aren't really many legitimate reasons not to see this company as a huge growth potential. The only argument you can't or shouldn't bother countering is a persons needing documented proof from audited financials prior to investing. I argued that point with Crawford, saying it's simply too soon with a start up this early into initial marketing of it's products to expect the numbers to justify investment as they might with a well established company. It's coming, but how could you ever expect to get in at ground floor with most start ups if you insist on documented proof of their success? You need to be able to predict it based on everything you know about the company and its products, including and especially the feedback from distributors, store owners/operators and customers. You need to be able to think outside the box, not rely on financial reports at the earliest stages for ground floor investment.