Posted On: 01/18/2016 7:28:21 PM
Post# of 22940
$TPAC Sometimes looking at the chain of Tweets and Replies, a lot of info is tied together out of order. Such as putting these two in a row:
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
I will say this-we have RFQs in hand. I won't say from whom or the bid size or the likelihood of capture. It's all part of normal business
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
I was then asked if we had an RFQ. I didn't/won't answer that. I won't tip our hand to competitors. No order ever is placed without an RFQ
While the second Tweet here is in regards to an RFQ for Boeing, it is the last sentence of that Tweet that sheds some serious speculative light on the first Tweet.
"No order ever is placed without an RFQ"
Now go back and read the first Tweet. It seems we are well on our way to another purchase order. While it may be of moderate value, there is a chance that it may very well be much larger.
It appears from this prior string of Twitter activity(see Dec 31, 2015) that it will be between 5 and 7 figures. This is in addition to our $100k purchase order that is said to have much greater inherent worth than the aforementioned monetary value.
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings 31 Dec 2015
Just received request from large Chinese company to assemble bearings. Meet Boeing on 1/8 & fly to China on 1/9 for this work & AVIC meeting
950 retweets 513 likes
Reply Retweet 950
Like 513
More
Carson Stauss @cstauss7 31 Dec 2015
@TPACbearings Is this separate from prior announced $100K CHINA based PO? Can you provide $ value?
1 retweet 4 likes
Reply Retweet 1
Like 4
More
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
@cstauss7 It's separate. I don't know the value yet. It could be somewhere between 5-7 figures. It depends on customer product development
Source: https://twitter.com/TPACbearings/with_replies
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
I will say this-we have RFQs in hand. I won't say from whom or the bid size or the likelihood of capture. It's all part of normal business
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
I was then asked if we had an RFQ. I didn't/won't answer that. I won't tip our hand to competitors. No order ever is placed without an RFQ
While the second Tweet here is in regards to an RFQ for Boeing, it is the last sentence of that Tweet that sheds some serious speculative light on the first Tweet.
"No order ever is placed without an RFQ"
Now go back and read the first Tweet. It seems we are well on our way to another purchase order. While it may be of moderate value, there is a chance that it may very well be much larger.
It appears from this prior string of Twitter activity(see Dec 31, 2015) that it will be between 5 and 7 figures. This is in addition to our $100k purchase order that is said to have much greater inherent worth than the aforementioned monetary value.
TPAC Bearings @TPACbearings 31 Dec 2015
Just received request from large Chinese company to assemble bearings. Meet Boeing on 1/8 & fly to China on 1/9 for this work & AVIC meeting
950 retweets 513 likes
Reply Retweet 950
Like 513
More
Carson Stauss @cstauss7 31 Dec 2015
@TPACbearings Is this separate from prior announced $100K CHINA based PO? Can you provide $ value?
1 retweet 4 likes
Reply Retweet 1
Like 4
More
Follow
TPAC Bearings
@TPACbearings
@cstauss7 It's separate. I don't know the value yet. It could be somewhere between 5-7 figures. It depends on customer product development
Source: https://twitter.com/TPACbearings/with_replies
(0)
(0)
Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.
Scroll down for more posts ▼
