Posted On: 12/29/2015 9:51:35 AM
Post# of 72447
More evidence cancer is transmissible, unfortunately.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-...345_1.html
There have been theories about viral causes for decades. This is evidence that the so-called "quacks" who theorized about this are not necessarily crackpots. (The theory here is that ingesting cancer cells transmits it -- the question in my mind is: is it the cells, or a virus contained therein?)
So often believers in "conventional knowledge" ridicule alternative theories, and it takes decades for alternative theories to be considered. I think that there are lots of causes of cancer, and studying these viral cases may also give important clues about other cancers.
It took a long time for the prion transmission of mad cow disease to be understood. Hopefully this will spur more research into transmissibility of cancer.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-...345_1.html
There have been theories about viral causes for decades. This is evidence that the so-called "quacks" who theorized about this are not necessarily crackpots. (The theory here is that ingesting cancer cells transmits it -- the question in my mind is: is it the cells, or a virus contained therein?)
So often believers in "conventional knowledge" ridicule alternative theories, and it takes decades for alternative theories to be considered. I think that there are lots of causes of cancer, and studying these viral cases may also give important clues about other cancers.
It took a long time for the prion transmission of mad cow disease to be understood. Hopefully this will spur more research into transmissibility of cancer.
(0)
(0)
