thx, dragnet. most of what you said i can agree with. what puzzles me right now is if this audit was as good as your have described it to be, then why was it released in such a manner? there is no PR on the release..and still none. if the company felt the content was as promising as you have painted it, wouldn't and shouldn't RMH have released a PR with the audit to walk people through the same conclusions that you have made?

perhaps RMH wanted to keep the audit report below the radar as maybe it would scare "at first glance" the average potential investor. but, the flip side of that is that by keeping it below the radar it creates the appearance that its worse than maybe it really is.

for many, many months all of us awaited the release of the audit. i had thought there would be cannons blasting to herald the release. it just strikes me as odd as to the manner and timing of the release and i'm trying to come up with some explanation about that.

2016 cant come quick enough.