Posted On: 12/10/2015 10:37:31 PM
Post# of 30039
Re: All Aboard #21733
I think we need to look at this from a different perspective. The loan was a bridge until Nasdaq listing was achieved. The SP held up over $4 and deteriorated quickly after failure to hold quorum for a shareholder meeting. The question is how could this have happened? Which one of the big insiders held out and for what purpose?
Compare that to this past meeting that was seamlessly put together to increase AS by much more under difficult conditions. Obviously GC and Co were blindsided and totally unprepared for what happened. Something does not add up.
As you said once the SP declined, there was no choice but to buy out the series G.
My question is who had the incentive to sabotage AMBS plan to up list to NASDAQ?
Compare that to this past meeting that was seamlessly put together to increase AS by much more under difficult conditions. Obviously GC and Co were blindsided and totally unprepared for what happened. Something does not add up.
As you said once the SP declined, there was no choice but to buy out the series G.
My question is who had the incentive to sabotage AMBS plan to up list to NASDAQ?
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
