Posted On: 12/09/2015 3:21:51 PM
Post# of 12259
Re: equijohn's post. Yes! CEOs of sub-penny stocks have authority to do RS (reverse splits) at their convenience. However, such CEOs do suffer bitter backlash from stunned shareholders. Case in point this sub-penny stock I used to own, but CEO's name and ticker symbol withheld for confidentiality. He used to promise shareholders of "no RS"! Then unexpectedly 2014 Feb, he invoked 1 to 1 000 reverse split.Angry shareholders dumped their shares. Post RS share price dropped 10 000 fold within 60 seconds! Price later recovered but still below pre-RS price. Believe it or not, but same CEO did yet another 1 to 1 000 RS within 6 months. Total 1 t0 1 000 000 (yes! 1 to 1 million RS) in 6 months! Shareholders lost entire "investments". Where is CEO now!? Lost his positions as Founder/Chairman/CEO. Company's status!? In coma! Or dead! Joe our MNGG CEO to be commended for hinting us of pending RS. His action might be necessary if he has stumbled across fantastic opportunity! Example, new gold mine; rich ore (say 5 to 20 oz per ton. Huge deposit (say 200 million tons).
Big enough to last say 50 years. Low cost of production (say production cost US$ 400 per ton). New owner(s) wish to merge with MNGG survivor.RS would be compelling option to minimize dilution. Restricted shares for new owner(s).
Big enough to last say 50 years. Low cost of production (say production cost US$ 400 per ton). New owner(s) wish to merge with MNGG survivor.RS would be compelling option to minimize dilution. Restricted shares for new owner(s).
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼