Posted On: 11/24/2015 8:20:39 PM
Post# of 72446
This from the actual la wsu it.
"Our scientific review has shown that Brilacidin is not effective even against EBSL
Enterobacteriaceae, unlike what Cellceutix claims. This means that Brilacidin is
not effective against any of the eight bacteria strains targeted in the Phase II"
How stupi d are these Rosen A-holes. If that was true how on gods green earth could the FDA approve moving to a Phase 3.
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://cellceuti...jpUcJCtfAw
The chart of the bacteria treated and the results are right there and were presented at Eccmid!
"Our scientific review has shown that Brilacidin is not effective even against EBSL
Enterobacteriaceae, unlike what Cellceutix claims. This means that Brilacidin is
not effective against any of the eight bacteria strains targeted in the Phase II"
How stupi d are these Rosen A-holes. If that was true how on gods green earth could the FDA approve moving to a Phase 3.
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://cellceuti...jpUcJCtfAw
The chart of the bacteria treated and the results are right there and were presented at Eccmid!
(0)
(0)
