Posted On: 11/10/2015 10:53:05 PM
Post# of 11039
If the shareholder letters had nothing to do with the ruling,...
Quote:
Durand Tuesday, 11/10/15 10:39:02 PM
Re: I-Glow post# 41475
Post # of 41477
I did read the order. If the shareholder letters had nothing to do with the ruling, then the ruling would not have quoted them. Part of the ruling said
"the likelihood that appointing the receiver will do more good than harm". It's obvious that appointing the receiver would do more harm than good and so the motion was denied just as I predicted
(0)
(0)
