Posted On: 11/09/2015 9:26:36 AM
Post# of 41414
Re: MikeSLTJ23 #19924
I'm with you, I'm expecting a slow news "week" basically between now and the end of the year. All for the conversation, haha...
I think that's very possible, maybe even likely in your scenario. However, I don't believe it's the right mentality, and I think it's ultimately the mentality that extends this issue for some time until Baltia gets litigious. I could be totally off, and I hope I am, but it's been 15 weeks. They aren't moving on this, seemingly.
If that's the FAA thinking, and I wouldn't be surprised if it is, it's flawed. How do you "fail" someone for a test that is fundamentally flawed? Where "passing" the test is, essentially, out of the hands of the one being tested?
How can you set a standard to prevent commerce, to extend this certification process with this ridiculous mini-evac when you, as the testing entity, don't even have the answers yourself?
Imagine being in school, being given a test, answering the questions, feeling confident you got everything right, then turning it in and the teacher saying "sorry, I can't grade it because I don't know any of the answers. You can't pass the course until I do, and I'm not going to know for a long time." No one would stand for it, obviously.
That's essentially what's going on, and the logic behind that is non-existent.
I think that's very possible, maybe even likely in your scenario. However, I don't believe it's the right mentality, and I think it's ultimately the mentality that extends this issue for some time until Baltia gets litigious. I could be totally off, and I hope I am, but it's been 15 weeks. They aren't moving on this, seemingly.
If that's the FAA thinking, and I wouldn't be surprised if it is, it's flawed. How do you "fail" someone for a test that is fundamentally flawed? Where "passing" the test is, essentially, out of the hands of the one being tested?
How can you set a standard to prevent commerce, to extend this certification process with this ridiculous mini-evac when you, as the testing entity, don't even have the answers yourself?
Imagine being in school, being given a test, answering the questions, feeling confident you got everything right, then turning it in and the teacher saying "sorry, I can't grade it because I don't know any of the answers. You can't pass the course until I do, and I'm not going to know for a long time." No one would stand for it, obviously.
That's essentially what's going on, and the logic behind that is non-existent.
(0)
(0)
