Posted On: 11/07/2015 1:14:43 PM
Post# of 72446
The constant cries on other sites for a partnership (at give-away prices, this early on) and/or a reverse split should tell us all we need to know:
It is in someone's best interest (but NOT the best interests of CTIX current shareholders) for these activities to take place.
Who would benefit from a reverse split, and a bad partnership deal that robs CTIX of a fair price? We've seen from the AVXL debacle that a reverse split certainly does NOT prevent stock manipulation -- it ran up to 14, back down to 8 in days, and probably much lower Monday despite its uplisting. And as far as the partnership screams, would CTIX shareholders profit from a lowball price for a partnership now, or a higher price later?
How would one try to force a bad partnership on a company? Perhaps by attacking the stock, making claims that the company needs financing (it doesn't, until late next year by which time they'll have a LOT more clinical trial results), and other outright lies to try to panic shareholders into selling?
Think about motives and so, so much becomes very clear.
It is in someone's best interest (but NOT the best interests of CTIX current shareholders) for these activities to take place.
Who would benefit from a reverse split, and a bad partnership deal that robs CTIX of a fair price? We've seen from the AVXL debacle that a reverse split certainly does NOT prevent stock manipulation -- it ran up to 14, back down to 8 in days, and probably much lower Monday despite its uplisting. And as far as the partnership screams, would CTIX shareholders profit from a lowball price for a partnership now, or a higher price later?
How would one try to force a bad partnership on a company? Perhaps by attacking the stock, making claims that the company needs financing (it doesn't, until late next year by which time they'll have a LOT more clinical trial results), and other outright lies to try to panic shareholders into selling?
Think about motives and so, so much becomes very clear.
(0)
(0)
