Posted On: 09/28/2015 9:24:58 PM
Post# of 72446
seriously interesting post .. posted there .. re: *Rosen* and lead plaintiff
so serial ambulance chaser .. most likely on hedgies' speed dial
combined with lead plaintiff .. who has a history as a lead plaintiff
discovery on this lead plaintiff's *habits* would be revealing imo
FarmaZutical Monday, 09/28/15 07:21:35 PM
Re: 1400 post# 123515
Post # 123524 of 123529 Go
It seems so. Mr. Zagami who is now lead plantiff in the case against CTIX was also lead plaintiff in a case that Rosen Law had in 2009. A lenghty case that ended in a settlement.
Rosen lists this particular case as one of their successes:
Zagami v. Natural Health Trends Corp., et al., Case No. 3:06-CV-1654-D
The Rosen Law Firm served as sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of § 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements in violation of GAAP. Plaintiffs settled this case for $2.75 million cash payment to class members.
===
4kids
so serial ambulance chaser .. most likely on hedgies' speed dial
combined with lead plaintiff .. who has a history as a lead plaintiff
discovery on this lead plaintiff's *habits* would be revealing imo
FarmaZutical Monday, 09/28/15 07:21:35 PM
Re: 1400 post# 123515
Post # 123524 of 123529 Go
It seems so. Mr. Zagami who is now lead plantiff in the case against CTIX was also lead plaintiff in a case that Rosen Law had in 2009. A lenghty case that ended in a settlement.
Rosen lists this particular case as one of their successes:
Zagami v. Natural Health Trends Corp., et al., Case No. 3:06-CV-1654-D
The Rosen Law Firm served as sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of § 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements in violation of GAAP. Plaintiffs settled this case for $2.75 million cash payment to class members.
===
4kids
(0)
(0)
