Posted On: 09/11/2015 1:29:48 PM
Post# of 876
since Enigmas raising of 2.5m was a condition (though could be waived by WOLV)
and the May 8k contemplated a closing date of June 30
that would logically indicate they had investors lined up in May
activity since then- WOLV raising 96800 July 13 to become working capital positive unless expenses exceeded ca 67k since may 31
and changing of the name to technologies (a USA requirement) are consistent w working towards that goal
as is the OTCQB uplisting and certification
btw, in the Sept 1 OTCQB certification Mr Haderer is using his pubco services co and analyst etc experience to dot all the i's and t's for new enigma investors especially
the OTCQB process wasnt required and is now expensive (10k surcharge for otc news service vs 4200 for pink co's) but would encourage investors-especially those who wont or cant invest in pinks (most institutions cant) and dont realize many SEC reporting co's are now pink due to new 1c min bid requirement
and this OTCQB activity may be because presumed lined up investors -see above- asked or needed more transparency esp if they were ignorant re the new OTCQB rules and that many SEC reporting co's are pink due to said rules-many investors not familiar w otc stocks-and also many brokers -are ignorant re these things
if so that would indicate such presumed investors were not familiar w otc investing- many big investors would not be
maybe their fund managers or gurus were on their typical pre-labor day vacations
when was last PR?
for those who dont know, the going concern opinion is basically required boilerplate for co's without sufficient cash flow or w negative net income or negative working capital=a large proportion of sub 1c co's-since then they have positive work capital -see above
I havent received a proxy form either by email or card-have they been sent out?
and the May 8k contemplated a closing date of June 30
that would logically indicate they had investors lined up in May
activity since then- WOLV raising 96800 July 13 to become working capital positive unless expenses exceeded ca 67k since may 31
and changing of the name to technologies (a USA requirement) are consistent w working towards that goal
as is the OTCQB uplisting and certification
btw, in the Sept 1 OTCQB certification Mr Haderer is using his pubco services co and analyst etc experience to dot all the i's and t's for new enigma investors especially
the OTCQB process wasnt required and is now expensive (10k surcharge for otc news service vs 4200 for pink co's) but would encourage investors-especially those who wont or cant invest in pinks (most institutions cant) and dont realize many SEC reporting co's are now pink due to new 1c min bid requirement
and this OTCQB activity may be because presumed lined up investors -see above- asked or needed more transparency esp if they were ignorant re the new OTCQB rules and that many SEC reporting co's are pink due to said rules-many investors not familiar w otc stocks-and also many brokers -are ignorant re these things
if so that would indicate such presumed investors were not familiar w otc investing- many big investors would not be
maybe their fund managers or gurus were on their typical pre-labor day vacations
when was last PR?
for those who dont know, the going concern opinion is basically required boilerplate for co's without sufficient cash flow or w negative net income or negative working capital=a large proportion of sub 1c co's-since then they have positive work capital -see above
I havent received a proxy form either by email or card-have they been sent out?
(0)
(0)
