Posted On: 08/19/2015 1:03:51 PM
Post# of 1084
Larry,
You must have me mistaken for someone else as I have never had any conversation with you on a telephone so there really is no need for me to email you to confirm but you do have me curious, what was discussed during this alleged discussion with me?
As for the veracity of the 1996 ISI attorney's letter, it predates TMMI coming out of Bankruptcy with it's ownership intact of the various iterations of the early code as confirmed by the Bankruptcy Courts of California in June of 1999 so I believe your misconception of the validity of the said letter certainly taints your "supporting of the company".
You must have me mistaken for someone else as I have never had any conversation with you on a telephone so there really is no need for me to email you to confirm but you do have me curious, what was discussed during this alleged discussion with me?
As for the veracity of the 1996 ISI attorney's letter, it predates TMMI coming out of Bankruptcy with it's ownership intact of the various iterations of the early code as confirmed by the Bankruptcy Courts of California in June of 1999 so I believe your misconception of the validity of the said letter certainly taints your "supporting of the company".
(0)
(0)
