Posted On: 08/18/2015 10:32:53 AM
Post# of 43066
Question for the folks who believe in the "Naked Shorter" conspiracy theory:
If there has been such uninterrupted naked shorting for the last 2000 consecutive days, driving this billion dollar company from seven bucks to a nickel for a +99% loss, wouldn't it be evidence that investing on such a theory isn't wise?
Or does the 100% losing streak over this last decade, when relying on the Naked Shorter theory of "billion dollar" OTC stocks, just mean that angst will be ratcheted up for the next pinky to come along with a revolutionary "address changer"?
If there has been such uninterrupted naked shorting for the last 2000 consecutive days, driving this billion dollar company from seven bucks to a nickel for a +99% loss, wouldn't it be evidence that investing on such a theory isn't wise?
Or does the 100% losing streak over this last decade, when relying on the Naked Shorter theory of "billion dollar" OTC stocks, just mean that angst will be ratcheted up for the next pinky to come along with a revolutionary "address changer"?
(0)
(0)
