Posted On: 08/08/2015 9:20:17 PM
Post# of 43066
Quote:Let's see, keep the property funded and not into foreclosure so when he declares the company insolvent, he then takes over all the property. Easy enough to know why he wants to maintain it himself.
but they CANT (pun intended) compete with the reality that RH (and previously
co.s founder) have self funded P2O's ops non stop since aromatics' minions booted
Quote:No form 4 ever filed that he took any shares of stock as of this time, correct? And really can't say what he's taken other than cash
they CANT argue with the reality that the CFO has taken one third of his 150k
salary in a sub 10c stock vs the *obvious* of cold hard cash
Quote:Sustainability, did you read the same 10Q - there is no sustainability, for the flagship, it's broken.
they CANT argue with the reality that *flagship* checks off multiple boxes across multiple levels where *sustainability* is concerned
Quote:Easily arguable as the 10Q says it's still broke, so exactly what buyers are lining up? Eco Nav? Prove it, third party in a secret undisclosed location and State? Prove it.
they CANT argue with the reality that P2O has buyers in their queue for *flagship*
Quote:Exactly, easy enough to explain why early, he was required to file an 8k to update the extension, why file that and file the 10Q, just file the 10Q and bury all the bad news in one lengthy report. This covers the requirement without paying for two reports.
they CANT argue with P2O's *filings* filed on time (or early)
.. and the expense entailed that accompanies said filings
Quote:Oh isn't that the pot calling the kettle black
what they can *exploit* .. and *prey upon* .. are those *unfamiliar* with complex arrangements courtesy of disruptive techs *emerging*
(0)
(0)
