Posted On: 07/18/2015 12:39:29 PM
Post# of 5282
trolls' mistaken belief .. deliberately fostered via SMBs
is first >> putting all investors into one category
as if any investor will ever share the same *outlook or experience*
as another
the second >> is always to *presume* that investors don't diversify
diversification *imo* goes hand in glove with *risk* tolerance
again due to luck and circumstances .. my first undertaking in the OTC ran 4 years
(2003 to 2007) .. resulting in a 10,000 buy @ 18c approx that would
be R/S to 833 shares (approx) .. (R/S Jan 2005) .. resulting in a *legit*
co. on the OTC that successfully outlasted *colluding entities* because
they did follow a process pertaining to uplisting .. to the Naz on 1.18.07
most of my 833 R/S shares were sold at the high of that partially laddered cover >> which was *approx* 28.00 ..
do the math ..
10,000 @ 18c (1800)
800 @ 28.00 (22,400)
we paid LTCG tax of 20% when taxes were filed on that gain
now some can argue that that investment was risky .. or that other stox did
better than that return .. but as always .. the fascination for others' monies
and investments is what separates those who *invest* >> vs those who illegally manipulate
or troll for their living
and anyone who has spent any time on a SMB .. learns that rather quickly
anyone extolling *others* to buy or sell .. always raises a *flag* in my book
4kids
is first >> putting all investors into one category
as if any investor will ever share the same *outlook or experience*
as another
the second >> is always to *presume* that investors don't diversify
diversification *imo* goes hand in glove with *risk* tolerance
again due to luck and circumstances .. my first undertaking in the OTC ran 4 years
(2003 to 2007) .. resulting in a 10,000 buy @ 18c approx that would
be R/S to 833 shares (approx) .. (R/S Jan 2005) .. resulting in a *legit*
co. on the OTC that successfully outlasted *colluding entities* because
they did follow a process pertaining to uplisting .. to the Naz on 1.18.07
most of my 833 R/S shares were sold at the high of that partially laddered cover >> which was *approx* 28.00 ..
do the math ..
10,000 @ 18c (1800)
800 @ 28.00 (22,400)
we paid LTCG tax of 20% when taxes were filed on that gain
now some can argue that that investment was risky .. or that other stox did
better than that return .. but as always .. the fascination for others' monies
and investments is what separates those who *invest* >> vs those who illegally manipulate
or troll for their living
and anyone who has spent any time on a SMB .. learns that rather quickly
anyone extolling *others* to buy or sell .. always raises a *flag* in my book
4kids
(0)
(0)
