i'm sorry this was seemingly missed

but i've posted about this since last March

imo ECO tested whatever they needed *tested* in the back half of 2013
i have no doubts that *monies* would have transferred by the first week of May

except *imo*

the 2nd buyer in P2O's queue impacted P2O's first buyer
i have no idea how or why but i'm convinced that there was some impact
based on 2.23.15's PR out of RH >> which literally reiterated what RH
noted in prior Nov's update (linked to) and i don't see RH expending one
cent on a PR that all P2O investors *knew* .. unless there was another reason

my take remains that something was significant .. which *fits* with RH's 5.5.15
update where he discusses size of this buyer re: a southern state

which again i suspect is *conservative* which is wise

that said imo as i've also noted a few x previously .. it will be beyond ironic
if the *northern state* >> which i suspect is NYS >> winds up being the first
purchaser of P2O's prox (cluster)

what i'm looking for isn't *another orchestrated* RUN with the *entities' auto reset back DOWN* >> on PTOI

i put nothing past those who manipulate .. which is why RH's articulation and transparency of what can be ..

goes a long way to allowing PTOI (stock) and P2O (co) to transition out of the OTC cesspool

4kids