Posted On: 06/20/2015 11:45:03 AM
Post# of 75076
That last issue is only a question for a stock on the "Pinks". At any other level, a company post a 1000 or 2000 percent sales increase and people scramble to position themselves to enjoy the ride up. On the "Pinks", because the results are not audited, anyone can level a claim of impropriety and it sticks. Getting off the "Pinks" is the solution and THCZ is taking steps to do just that. Normally, an investor has no idea who owns what within a company AND you never question it. You buy and sell stocks based on a belief in the system and the information you get from the exchanges, ratings entities, and the company itself.
Example: I have bought, sold, and owned CHK for years. Recently, they ousted their CEO. Only then, did I find out that he(said CEO) was getting a percentage of every well drilled. What impact did that have on the investor, many of whom made buckets of money based on the stock performance OVER YEARS? None. That's right, an issue that would surely have been used by shorts, were it publicly known, did not prevent me or other shareholders from making great profits over more than a decade.
I could give 50 examples of large companies who have split off parts of the company or partnered with other companies to relieve debts. Even with audited results, the public rarely knows the structure of such deals. The question is legality and ethics, not whether some person owning 1 millionth of the company understands it.
You can bet on this, regardless of what happens over the next couple of weeks, the people who are good with math will calculate the quarterly sales change from $50K to $500K or $1M and see that their is HUGE potential there. The kind of potential that can not only erase debts, but with continued growth, cannot be stopped. Investors will swing back and forth in greed and fear, but GROWTH, especially EXPONENTIIAL GROWTH , has a way of overshadowing EVERYTHING. This stock will continue to bounce around based on the product, the sales, and the ability of shorts to scare people who do not understand the first two.
Example: I have bought, sold, and owned CHK for years. Recently, they ousted their CEO. Only then, did I find out that he(said CEO) was getting a percentage of every well drilled. What impact did that have on the investor, many of whom made buckets of money based on the stock performance OVER YEARS? None. That's right, an issue that would surely have been used by shorts, were it publicly known, did not prevent me or other shareholders from making great profits over more than a decade.
I could give 50 examples of large companies who have split off parts of the company or partnered with other companies to relieve debts. Even with audited results, the public rarely knows the structure of such deals. The question is legality and ethics, not whether some person owning 1 millionth of the company understands it.
You can bet on this, regardless of what happens over the next couple of weeks, the people who are good with math will calculate the quarterly sales change from $50K to $500K or $1M and see that their is HUGE potential there. The kind of potential that can not only erase debts, but with continued growth, cannot be stopped. Investors will swing back and forth in greed and fear, but GROWTH, especially EXPONENTIIAL GROWTH , has a way of overshadowing EVERYTHING. This stock will continue to bounce around based on the product, the sales, and the ability of shorts to scare people who do not understand the first two.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
