So apparently a link to show shares were issued and then two events only noted is 'proof'.

But what it isn't is a link showing it is absolutely Senecas certs being used as you describe.

It is your opinion .

Or as you put it 'rather intriguing coincidence'. Which of course, by using that particular phrasing, immediately shows no absolute link can be supplied.

Love it, links must be supplied by others as proof, yet when confronted to adhere to the same conditions, none are proffered.

I will end this now before I get cut off.....that usually follows divert and deflect when totally boxed in.