"Are you certain.....K.F., that if we think about your logic for 3 minutes, that we will think just like you are instructing us to? I think that there are at least 20% of the share holders that have shown over the past few days that you are completely wrong about this."

Absolutely LB. You're actually not the first one to think I'm wrong on that so please tell me your take. I haven't heard back from the other person. I try to be accurate and I'll actually thank you if you can show me I'm wrong.

Say that in the past six years, PTOI has identified some customer who would benefit by processing some waste/bi-product/other material into oil with a PTOI processor. That customer would have been happy to pay PTOI to process that material, right?? No such customer was found in six years. No customer so far has decided to have PTOI process their waste.

Now understandably there are costs to ship the material to PTOI's facilities, costs which the customer would ultimately have had to pay so, optimistically, maybe that additional material shipping cost is all that has been standing in the way of PTOI ever finding a paying customer.

So with a customer buying a processor and placing the processor at the customer site, doesn't a customer effectively remove material shipping costs for a price tag of $2,500,000? Doesn't the customer effectively eliminate material shipping costs under the old PTOI business plan and instead pay $2,500,000 under the new PTOI business plan?