Posted On: 06/06/2015 11:04:11 AM
Post# of 43066
i will gladly add my name to that list
what i find telling with each weeks' *theme* out of the crew
(RER = regrouping efforts required) is that they themselves
are forced into 2 avenues .. first is always by rote the PPS
(which even they have acknowledged was both wash traded
and manipulated over the years) .. the 2nd is they are stuck
maligning every aspect of P2O >> pre RH as Ceo .. but have
to dance around the obvious post RH's install ..
RH has self funded P2O from his install
RH has noted via 3 filings >> changeout of business model (8.13/11.13/12.13)
RH has hired a CFO (who gave a big clue they avoid like the plague
of taking $50,000 in a sub 10c stock vs cold hard cash)
RH (along with co.s founder) and flagship have been tested by OBG since 2013
even more telling is how many of them have never worked for either a start up
or any disruptive tech or apparently never took one basic business course
let alone advanced entrepreneurship
the expectation of seamless from a start up is laughable
what isn't laughable is what took place from 2009 to 2013 (flagship)
it's subsequent testing (flagship not priors) and mgmt's wise decision
to EVOLVE the business model re: P2O's ecosystem and sales
and all of this was done under CONtinued attacks by 2 very disparate entities
who only had two aspects in common ..
(off shore = London and GREED)
here's to *discovery*
4kids
Quote:
It would be interesting to have a list of long termers who refuse to sell because of their continued belief in the company.
what i find telling with each weeks' *theme* out of the crew
(RER = regrouping efforts required) is that they themselves
are forced into 2 avenues .. first is always by rote the PPS
(which even they have acknowledged was both wash traded
and manipulated over the years) .. the 2nd is they are stuck
maligning every aspect of P2O >> pre RH as Ceo .. but have
to dance around the obvious post RH's install ..
RH has self funded P2O from his install
RH has noted via 3 filings >> changeout of business model (8.13/11.13/12.13)
RH has hired a CFO (who gave a big clue they avoid like the plague
of taking $50,000 in a sub 10c stock vs cold hard cash)
RH (along with co.s founder) and flagship have been tested by OBG since 2013
even more telling is how many of them have never worked for either a start up
or any disruptive tech or apparently never took one basic business course
let alone advanced entrepreneurship
the expectation of seamless from a start up is laughable
what isn't laughable is what took place from 2009 to 2013 (flagship)
it's subsequent testing (flagship not priors) and mgmt's wise decision
to EVOLVE the business model re: P2O's ecosystem and sales
and all of this was done under CONtinued attacks by 2 very disparate entities
who only had two aspects in common ..
(off shore = London and GREED)
here's to *discovery*
4kids
(0)
(0)
