Posted On: 05/18/2015 12:46:46 PM
Post# of 43066
vs. >> speaking of *sustainability* .. 2012 (November pre *dolt's settlement*)
==
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 11/04/12 09:37:17 AM
Re: Eliot Ness post# 202519
Post # of 282508
completely false
risk is always in place on the OTC or the big boards for that matter ..
there would be far less risk .. if the sec required total transparency
out of those marker makers and their bosses (cause this was never
retail) including who exactly financially benefited at very specific times
(talk about an investigation) ..
risk is mitigated by independent research and analysis
(SAIC is just the latest re: P2O's viability and sustainability)
which is why wiser heads within the sec didn't *halt* JBII last Jan
even tho' that *event* was >> so >> gleefully anticipated
the SEC's poorly written (albeit very wordy) complaint was issued
on 1.4.12 >> months b4 that collective group of international investors
(with their eye popping connections) >> entered JBI via JBII
and when they sell (or add) there will be filings to reflect that activity
(remember there were open market buys too .. far higher than 80c) ..
the pps on JBII can be >> and has been >> orchestrated >> but losses
on paper mean squat to those who invest for the LONG TERM
this last round of PIPE equates to VC monies >> and yep they know exactly what
they are doing and *more importantly* the TIME FRAME >> they are doing it in ..
here's a hint >> that time frame >> isn't measured in the life span of a gnat
5 to 8 to 10 yrs is *normal* >> that is why what JBI has achieved
in 4 years is so stunning >> commercial roll comes next (and that
won't be *funded* via pipes) ..
===
the only fraud committed re: JBI/JBII pertains to a non transparent system
that allows a very select group of Market Participants to
create smoke and mirrors .. particularly on the OTC where the SEC
will admit *lax* oversight >> to put it succinctly >> they didn't care >>
they never focused on trading and their hypocrisy reveals
itself completely specific to DOMK and those media credits
bottom line is forensics reveals all and unlike most OTC co.s who
are *prey* >> JBI has access to trading data >> the sec's very
intentional *weak* spot >> that CONveniently >> benefits certain
marker makers and those who *hired* them ..
sec's stall mode can only go so long >> because not only does P2O WORK
the company will be CFP >> an end date is known >> and *circumstances*
will force an *accounting* .. in due course
either via an accretive acquisition or the co. going it alone >>
which means the odds of a forward split increase significantly within 12/15 months of uplisting x2
as i've noted many times >> check any leader sectors' SS at the time
of their IPO >> then 12 to 15 months later >> and then 5 years on
this isn't rocket science >> it's the soon to be acknowledged leader in a new and evolving sector >> whose name (P2O/P2F)
will be a household term by the end of the decade
==
4kids
all jmo
==
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 11/04/12 09:37:17 AM
Re: Eliot Ness post# 202519
Post # of 282508
Quote:
The problem with your line of argument is the PIPERs got discounted shares and C. They entered with 0 chance of losing money. Except for a trading halt by the SEC. Now the fraud committed has to do with luring general traders to buy shares. That is a big SEC red flag. Simple.
completely false
risk is always in place on the OTC or the big boards for that matter ..
there would be far less risk .. if the sec required total transparency
out of those marker makers and their bosses (cause this was never
retail) including who exactly financially benefited at very specific times
(talk about an investigation) ..
risk is mitigated by independent research and analysis
(SAIC is just the latest re: P2O's viability and sustainability)
which is why wiser heads within the sec didn't *halt* JBII last Jan
even tho' that *event* was >> so >> gleefully anticipated
the SEC's poorly written (albeit very wordy) complaint was issued
on 1.4.12 >> months b4 that collective group of international investors
(with their eye popping connections) >> entered JBI via JBII
and when they sell (or add) there will be filings to reflect that activity
(remember there were open market buys too .. far higher than 80c) ..
the pps on JBII can be >> and has been >> orchestrated >> but losses
on paper mean squat to those who invest for the LONG TERM
this last round of PIPE equates to VC monies >> and yep they know exactly what
they are doing and *more importantly* the TIME FRAME >> they are doing it in ..
here's a hint >> that time frame >> isn't measured in the life span of a gnat
5 to 8 to 10 yrs is *normal* >> that is why what JBI has achieved
in 4 years is so stunning >> commercial roll comes next (and that
won't be *funded* via pipes) ..
===
the only fraud committed re: JBI/JBII pertains to a non transparent system
that allows a very select group of Market Participants to
create smoke and mirrors .. particularly on the OTC where the SEC
will admit *lax* oversight >> to put it succinctly >> they didn't care >>
they never focused on trading and their hypocrisy reveals
itself completely specific to DOMK and those media credits
bottom line is forensics reveals all and unlike most OTC co.s who
are *prey* >> JBI has access to trading data >> the sec's very
intentional *weak* spot >> that CONveniently >> benefits certain
marker makers and those who *hired* them ..
sec's stall mode can only go so long >> because not only does P2O WORK
the company will be CFP >> an end date is known >> and *circumstances*
will force an *accounting* .. in due course
either via an accretive acquisition or the co. going it alone >>
which means the odds of a forward split increase significantly within 12/15 months of uplisting x2
as i've noted many times >> check any leader sectors' SS at the time
of their IPO >> then 12 to 15 months later >> and then 5 years on
this isn't rocket science >> it's the soon to be acknowledged leader in a new and evolving sector >> whose name (P2O/P2F)
will be a household term by the end of the decade
==
4kids
all jmo
(0)
(0)
