Posted On: 04/27/2015 1:46:25 PM
Post# of 1850
Re: iggyman555 #1738
I think many of us have been pestering management for an update on the third parcel. As was explained in previous PRs and the 10K, they cannot get into specifics on the value of each parcel and the origin of the material until their is sufficient obfuscation so as to defuse any probable security risk. We may not like the non-transparent nature of this approach, but, it is in our best interest.
The next Q will likely have verifiable details fort he two shipments and it is due in a few weeks (May 15 or May 20 if in conjunction with an NT-10Q as is tradition.)
Personally, I am not worried about the fluff PRs anymore. The 10K restored significant credibility in my opinion as it provided proof of Parcel 1 and explanation of all issues we have seen over the past year. At this point, knowledge that Parcel 3 is completed and is probably in the export process. I am hoping they can get it to the buyer by the end of the week so that we see something in the Q, otherwise, it will be August before we see the value.
Oh well, Rome wasn't built in a day.
The next Q will likely have verifiable details fort he two shipments and it is due in a few weeks (May 15 or May 20 if in conjunction with an NT-10Q as is tradition.)
Personally, I am not worried about the fluff PRs anymore. The 10K restored significant credibility in my opinion as it provided proof of Parcel 1 and explanation of all issues we have seen over the past year. At this point, knowledge that Parcel 3 is completed and is probably in the export process. I am hoping they can get it to the buyer by the end of the week so that we see something in the Q, otherwise, it will be August before we see the value.
Oh well, Rome wasn't built in a day.
(0)
(0)DSUS -
JMHO---
GO DSUS!!
Drone Services USA - aka DSUSA!!
Scroll down for more posts ▼
