"IMO investors are waiting to hear whether or not a buyer has found a situation where a PTOI processor will allow them to meet their needs; we can postulate until the cows come home about whether or not any situation meets your stated needs. I allow for the possibility that there are other metrics besides yours that the process can be measured by, that will meet the needs of customers."

Cost/revenues indicates whether the process can be commercially viable or not. I understand you may be talking about additional environmental benefits or other benefits which don't benefit a buyer's bottom line. If we can determine whether or not the process makes sense from an economic perspective then maybe we can focus exclusively on the 'other-than-economic' benefits.

So let me ask you again, would you agree that it would be worthwhile for you and investors to know whether PTOI has found any situation where they can transform a continuous, consistent source of plastic into a fuel having a sustainable demand at a price higher than the cost of that plastic?

If you can give me an actual straight yes or no answer on that, I will ask IR myself, saying that both I and at least one other investor would like to know whether that's the case. I can't guarantee an answer, but I'll ask. If you think it's worthless to know the cost/price because your imagination says there are multiple, yet unexplored benefits which aren't included in the company's or a buyer's bottom line, that's certainly fine too.

Keep in mind if, contrary to PTOI's initial claims, PTOI is still *searching* for a way in which a buyer could benefit or for a buyer which might benefit from the process...then the process isn't any better than regular pyrolysis. Then it's simply an answer for which the question hasn't been found. That applies to many, many processes.