i have provided a similar-or-same comparison (to this board). stocks that have not gone up in price (despite being audited). they actually went lower. one losing almost 99% of value (based upon that years highest open or close)

audits in time. i see that they may be your number one concern. but it isn't mine. and not those of independent thinkers

i have posted proof why. and your proof?

aside from rehashing the common claims of others? can you post same-or-similar (to ntek) comparisons to support your claim? (talk is cheap)

where's the proof that revenues. growth. investment in content. should be secondary to audits?

i'd like to see proof. you saying, "sell shares higher" sounds good.... but in reality doesn't cut it for me. its not time for audits yet. happy to read your proof and substantiation to the contrary