Cry babies? Is that how one defines shareholders who challenge your wild-ass "thesis" (by your own description) of Gerald's involvement with some shady characters? You were simply asked to provide proof or links to support to your claims. You refused, claiming the info was easy to find with a Google search, and then making the ridiculous claim that providing links would violate copyright law. Really?

I just finished a chapter on copyright law in my Ethics in Information Technology class, and the accuracy of that claim appears to be in orbit around the planet Ur-Anus.

The only thing Bizzaro about this scenario is the inability to provide any evidence to support your "concern", which you claimed was easy to find. Apparently not. You also forgot to mention the moderators gave you multiple warnings and ample opportunity to either retract your claim or provide verifiable evidence to support it. You chose to cry about it, which is why you were kicked back to this board.

Get your facts correct if you're going to bellyache about being booted.