Dude, you go into a multi-paragraph rant over Gerald, when the only thing I mentioned in my post about Gerald was what he said he was going to do with the AS increase, which he has done with the recent acquisitions. His plan for acquisitions was in his response to JP's first question during the Business Update Call on September 2, 2014. He clearly notified shareholders some of the shares would be used for strategic acquisitions. From what I've read, most shareholders are happy and excited about those additions to our asset portfolio. Only those focused hour-to-hour on the share price are crying about dilution.

JP Q&A - Sept 2014

I'm not joining your campaign to replace Gerald as CEO, and I believe you're going to look like the fool in the coming weeks and months of 2015 for even suggesting it.

Wait for it.

If I were you, I'd further reduce my holdings since we have this incompetent and untrustworthy CEO at the helm. If your campaign gathers traction, you can always buy back when your confidence is much higher. Maybe even contact Dr. Lowe and start your recruiting efforts. Let us know if he laughs at your suggestion.

You should really answer this question about your claim, which you conveniently avoided.

Quote:

---

Your claim:
Upper management all get millions of options to buy shares on the cheap up to ten years from now or even longer. They are immune to the ravages of dilution to the stock price over the short term.

My question:
How exactly does upper management benefit from exercising their options if they dilute the company into oblivion as you think they're doing? How are they immune from this effect?

---

We're all waiting for the critical thinking on this claim.